- The US’ new habit of releasing intelligence to counter what the government calls Russian propaganda has been well documented.
- Included in that were allegations US intelligence officials made to the Associated Press about a conservative financial website with few visible ties to Russia.
- The nature of the allegations and the way the US made them highlight the depth to which governments will go in the new information wars.
For months prior to Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, U.S. intelligence agencies released information about Russian President Vladimir Putin’s plans to attack the neighboring country.
Some of the releases came in the form of military intelligence, such as the map of Russia’s military positions detailing one possible route for a Russian invasion of Ukraine. Others came when officials from President Joe Biden’s administration made the rounds on Sunday morning talk shows to publicize intelligence on Russia, including a possible “false-flag” operation that detailed the gruesome visuals intended to create a pretext to invade Ukraine.
And some of the government’s other attempts to counter misinformation were conducted through anonymous sources leaking information to American media outlets.
Experts say the entire approach represents a departure for the U.S. and a new front in the info wars with Russia.
Rather than fact-checking Putin’s claims, the U.S. has turned to declassifying intelligence to shut down Russian disinformation and propaganda – a much more aggressive tactic, according to M. Steven Fisher, a professor of political science at the University of California, Berkeley.
“It’s weaponizing the truth in a way that we didn’t before. We’ve always been on the defensive,” Fisher added. “We’re always on the defensive against these barrages of disinformation and lies.”
►Live updates:Zelenskyy calls attack on Kharkiv ‘a war crime’ as 40-mile convoy rolls toward Kyiv
►Ukraine latest: Stay up to date with our daily newsletter covering developments in Ukraine
►Fact check roundup:What’s true and what’s false about the Russian invasion of Ukraine

Included in the string of intel released in the run up to the war were accusations anonymous U.S. intelligence sources leveled against Zero Hedge, a conservative financial news website with Russian roots that are ‘not as obvious’, experts say, representing an even further, if murkier, step in the information wars.
U.S. officials said Zero Hedge, a Bulgarian website, published articles produced by Moscow-controlled media, which were later shared by other outlets and individuals unaware of the site’s ties to Russian intelligence. However, officials didn’t indicate that the website was directly linked to Russia.
Zero Hedge denied the accusation, stating they try to “publish a wide spectrum of views that cover both sides of a given story” in a post responding to the claims. The website also denied any relation with Russia, saying they have “never worked, collaborated or cooperated with Russia nor are there any links to spy” agencies.
Regardless of its relationship with Russia, Zero Hedge has appeared to be an avenue for Russian propaganda, experts said – although not as discernible as other outlets.
►Info wars:Google, Microsoft, other big tech companies grapple with Russian state media, propaganda
There are several publications that share similar information and some are more obviously connected to Russia, including state-controlled outlets Sputnik and RT. But Zero Hedge’s connection to Russia isn’t as clear, Todd Helmus, a senior behavioral scientist at the RAND corporation told USA TODAY.

“This is different in the sense that the Russian roots are not as obvious, and the U.S. government is not saying that the publication is aligned or controlled by Russia,” Helmus said. “But this is the kind of thing Russia wants to do. They want their news disseminated to publications that appear legitimate in hopes that the news essentially gets laundered by the U.S. market.”
Helmus also explained that it’s not obvious whether the publication is unwittingly or willfully amplifying pro-Russian propaganda and disinformation.
While Zero Hedge gained readership for their coverage of market and financial news, the website also has covered politics, including several articles disputing the threats of Russia invading Ukraine and calling it a “conventional narrative” by U.S. officials and media.
Among the contributors to Zero Hedge, several are affiliated with the Strategic Culture Foundation, a Russian foreign intelligence-run organization, according to Fisher.
►TikTok:TikTok is Russia’s newest weapon in arsenal for anti-Ukraine propaganda
The United States sanctioned the Strategic Culture Foundation last year after allegations of its role in Russia’s interference in the 2020 U.S. election. U.S. intelligence officials also alleged that the leaders of the foundation were associated with the SVR, the Russian foreign intelligence service.
Zero Hedge denied any relationship with the Strategic Culture Foundation or the SVR in an emailed statement to the Associated Press, saying that there “is no relationship between Strategic Cultural Foundation (or the SVR) and Zero Hedge, and furthermore, this is the first time we hear someone allege that the Foundation is linked to Russian propaganda.”
Fisher said the oblique allegations from the U.S. government that center on contributors to a financial news website were another example of the West’s aggressive approach to countering Putin’s propaganda.
“If Biden and our NATO allies keep this up, it would represent a massive shift, the balance of power in the information wars,” he said.
Biden shared similar sentiments about maintaining transparency on Putin’s intentions last week when he announced the new sanctions on Russia.

“We shared declassified evidence about Russia’s plans and false pretext so that there could be no confusion or cover-up about what Putin’s doing,” Biden said. “Putin is the aggressor. Putin chose this war. And now he and his country will bear the consequences.”
Members of both major political parties applauded the often-criticized U.S. intelligence community, crediting the release of the information with stalling Putin.
“The intelligence community usually doesn’t like to share information; they want to hold it close,” said Sen. Mark Warner, D-Va., chairman of the Senate Intelligence Committee. “What they’ve done is push the Russian timeline back. They’ve also, I think, allowed us to build this coalition that is virtually unprecedented.”
Rep. Mike Turner, of Ohio, the lead Republican on the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence, joined Warner in praising the intelligence community.
“This has both impacted the international community’s view of Putin and has slowed his actions,” Turner, the top Republican on the House Intelligence Committee, said. “The goal in releasing intelligence is to permit Ukraine to plan, and any delay in Putin’s actions helped Ukraine in the planning to defend itself.”
More Russia-Ukraine coverage
Contributing: Associated Press
Leave a Reply